In 1904 Japan went to war against Russia, the
culmination of some years of jockeying for position in Manchuria and Korea. Few
expected the Japanese to last long in battle, let alone win. As everyone knows,
the war ended in humiliation for Russia the following year, with two of her
fleets destroyed and her army battered. That the Japanese were victorious was
partly due to Russian military ineptitude and logistical inefficiency, and
Japanese acceptance of horrific casualty rates. But the Japanese were also
innovative in their use of heavy artillery.

They laid siege to Port Arthur
in early May 1904. In June, eighteen coastal defence howitzers of 28 cm calibre
were dismantled and loaded on a ship bound for the besieging armies.
Unfortunately for the Japanese, in one of the few Russian successes of the war,
the ship was sunk, taking its precious cargo of artillery and hundreds of troops
to the bottom of the sea. It was not until October that they succeeded in
transporting another eighteen howitzers to the battlefield. After seizing a
tactically vital hill near Port Arthur, during which shocking troop losses were
incurred, the Japanese finally were able to shell the Port into submission, also
sinking the Russian Pacific Fleet which had been bottled up for months by the
Japanese Navy.

Information as to the origins of these guns is vague in most
modern publications, with some sources claiming that they were of Krupp design,
and possibly manufacture, despite the most un-German interrupted screw breech.
It can now be shown that they were, in fact, manufactured in Japan from the
start, to a British design which had originally been drawn up for the Italians!
The story is as follows…
As Japan embarked on its frenetic modernisation programme
after the Meiji Restoration of 1867, two arsenals were set up for the
manufacture of weapons: the Tokyo Arsenal, which specialised in small arms, and
the Osaka Arsenal, which specialised in artillery. In line with their policy of
employing foreign specialists, the Japanese engaged the Italian Major Pompeio
Grillo in April 1884 to teach them gun making. Meanwhile, the armaments firm of
Sir W G Armstrong, Mitchell & Co had been producing 28cm rifled breech loading
howitzers for Italy, the ties between British arms manufacturers and the Italian
military and navy being particularly strong (just as similar ties were to be
forged with Japan).
Consequently, the Japanese began to manufacture howitzers to
the same design, presumably under license, at the Osaka Arsenal. Trial examples
were started in June 1884, and production began in earnest in August 1886. This
explains why the same design of 28cm howitzer was to be found with such ubiquity
in the coastal defences of both Japan and Italy. In the latter nation, the
weapon was designated Obice da 280. It was employed, not without effect, on the
static front at the Isonzo, at least up until 1917, when several, if not most,
were captured in the famous Caporetto Offensive.
Stubby,
bottle-shaped weapons, their carriages were mounted on slides to absorb the
recoil. These slides were, in turn, mounted on turntables, giving 360 degree
traverse. In the manner of the time, they were installed in batteries to protect
ports and naval bases. The prevailing thought was that their high-angle fire and
217 kg shells would be devastating against the thin deck armour of enemy
battleships which, because fire-control and aiming were poor, would have to
approach quite close to the coast. However, that same poor fire control makes
one wonder how useful indirect-fire coast defence guns would be against moving
targets, even if those targets were relatively slow battleships. What
cannot be doubted is that against stationery targets, the guns were
appallingly effective.

This
use of such heavy artillery in the field was a new development, and called into
question European strategies of relying on fortified defensive networks,
particularly in Belgium and France. These had been built at great cost in the
1880s and 1890s, and were based on the assumption that the heaviest mobile siege
artillery was limited by being horse-drawn, with an upper limit on calibre of
around 21 cm. By dint of stupendously hard work, the Japanese had demonstrated
that much larger weapons could be used on the battlefield. Yet hardly anyone in
Europe took note of this - apart from the Germans and Austro-Hungarians. Japan's
lesson merely spurred on their experiments with large calibre field artillery,
culminating in the infamous 30.5cm Skoda Mörser and the 42 cm Big Bertha.
As for the Japanese 28 cm howitzers, they
continued to be used for coastal defence, and were again pressed into service in
the field when Japan rather opportunistically, and with British help, seized
Tsing-Tao from Germany in 1914. After that, the guns appear to have remained in
their shore batteries in Japan, mainly used for training purposes, before fading
from the scene completely.

The technical
performance of 28cm Siege Howitzer was as follows:
| Calibre
Length |
12 |
| Weight of
gun |
40.02 tons |
| Weight of
shell |
215kg |
| Elevation |
-5˚ to +60˚ |
|
Traverse |
180˚ |
| Max Range |
11.400m |
| Min Range |
1.250m |
| Muzzle
velocity |
430m/sec |
Footnotes:
Most of the information on these weapons has been culled from
the internet and assorted publications. However, the following proved invaluable
in finally identifying the mysterious origins of these fascinating and important
weapons:
·
‘Military Industries of
Japan’ by Ushisaburō Kobayashi, p.43 (Oxford University Press, 1922)
·
Brassey’s Naval Annual,
1892, p.292
The rare colorized photos comes
courtesy of Anton Ryzbak.